Browse Archives

By Category

By Date

Bastiat Prize 2007 Winner

Recent entries

Witchcraft In India

The Times of India has a story today on a tribal woman in a village in Madhya Pradesh who…

Amitava Kumar Brings Rave Out To Life

Those of you who read this blog through their feed readers may not notice when other sections of this…

Sarah Palin, Post-Turtle

Ben Macintyre introduces us to the term ‘post-turtle’: A 75-year-old Texas rancher recently explained this term to a country…

Sowing And Mowing

The news item of the day comes from The Hindu: Air Customs seized 59 handguns from the baggage of…

The Do-It-Yourself Ethic

The headline of the day concerns, surprise surprise, Sarah Palin: Palin pre-empts state report, clears self in probe The…

10 September, 2007

On Rejection

Rejected writers, take heart: It happens to the best of us. In an article titled “No Thanks, Mr. Nabokov,” David Oshinsky tells us the story of how Alfred A. Knopf Inc. once turned down Anne Frank’s The Diary of a Young Girl because they thought it “a dreary record of typical family bickering, petty annoyances and adolescent emotions.” Oshinsky reports:

The Anne Frank reader’s report is part of the massive Knopf archive housed in the Harry Ransom Humanities Research Center at the University of Texas. The document is one of thousands tucked away in the publisher’s rejection files, a place where whopping editorial blunders are mercifully entombed. Nothing embarrasses a publisher more than the public knowledge that a literary classic or a mega best seller has somehow slipped away. One of them turned down Pearl Buck’s novel “The Good Earth” on the grounds that Americans were “not interested in anything on China.” Another passed on George Orwell’s “Animal Farm,” explaining it was “impossible to sell animal stories in the U.S.A.” (It’s not only publishers: Tony Hillerman was dumped by an agent who urged him to “get rid of all that Indian stuff.”)

[...] The rejection files, which run from the 1940s through the 1970s, include dismissive verdicts on the likes of Jorge Luis Borges (“utterly untranslatable”), Isaac Bashevis Singer (“It’s Poland and the rich Jews again”), Anaïs Nin (“There is no commercial advantage in acquiring her, and, in my opinion, no artistic”), Sylvia Plath (“There certainly isn’t enough genuine talent for us to take notice”) and Jack Kerouac (“His frenetic and scrambling prose perfectly express the feverish travels of the Beat Generation. But is that enough? I don’t think so”). In a two-year stretch beginning in 1955, Knopf turned down manuscripts by Jean-Paul Sartre, Mordecai Richler, and the historians A. J. P. Taylor and Barbara Tuchman, not to mention Vladimir Nabokov’s “Lolita” (too racy) and James Baldwin’s “Giovanni’s Room” (“hopelessly bad”).

So there you have it. If you’ve been rejected by a publisher, you’re in the company of Nabokov, Singer and Borges. And if you’ve been published, you’re still in their company, because they got published as well. Life could hardly be better.

(Link via Amitava Kumar.)

Posted by Amit Varma in Arts and entertainment

Copyright (C) India Uncut - http://indiauncut.com
All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission. Email: amitblogs@gmail.com
This article is permanently archived at:
http://indiauncut.com/iublog/article/on-rejection-and-alfred-a-knopf/