By Category
By Date
Dear Mrinal Pande
In your column today you insinuate that all opposition to Pratibha Patil is based on her gender. That is unfair. Some of us are opposing Ms Patil not because we’re worried about the empowerment of women, but because of personal flaws that have nothing to do with her gender. Allow me to ask you two questions.
One, are you comfortable with a president who claims that she can converse with spirits? To me, this would indicate a mental health problem, and I hope you would agree with me that our president needs to be of sound mind.
Two, Ms Patil had once expressed her support for forcible sterilization of people with hereditary diseases. Is it not fair to ask that she at least indicates that she has changed her mind on the subject, even if she doesn’t actually apologize for it? Ms Patil supported Indira Gandhi during and after the Emergency, and surely it is fair to worry that she might still represent those values.
Please note that I am not expressing my support for Bhairon Singh Shekhawat by opposing Ms Patil. I am merely bemoaning the fact that the UPA did not choose a better candidate. I would have been delighted if that candidate was a woman, as long as she had the character and intellect that the office of president deserves.
If you would care to stand for the post, Ms Pande, I would support you wholeheartedly. But not Pratibha Patil.
Regards
Amit Varma
* * *
Previous posts on Pratibha Patil: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.
This is a scary story. Read the full thing. (Via Gautam.)
By Amit Varma in Politics
First off, stay with high-quality human beings. (Note: Not for “one-sided love affairs with someone who isn’t interested.")
By Sanjeev Naik in Economics
Pablo Bartholomew's latest exhibition offers intimate recall of the 70s and 80s
Read more...
Loins of Punjab Presents is a declaration of independence by the desi diaspora
Read more...
Sample clues
9 across: Van Morrison classic from Moondance (7)
6 down: Order beginning with ‘A’ (12)